Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients?
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper I argue that it is morally important for doctors to trust patients. Doctors' trust of patients lays the foundation for medical relationships which support the exercise of patient autonomy, and which lead to an enriched understanding of patients' interests. Despite the moral and practical desirability of trust, distrust may occur for reasons relating to the nature of medicine, and the social and cultural context within which medical care is provided. Whilst it may not be possible to trust at will, the conscious adoption of a trusting stance is both possible and warranted as the burdens of misplaced trust fall more heavily upon patients than doctors.
منابع مشابه
Is there an important moral distinction for medical ethics between lying and other forms of deception?
In this issue of the journal Ms Jennifer Jackson continues her defence of her thesis that whereas 'we all have a strict duty not to lie, we are not all under a duty of this kind not to deceive intentionally in ways that do not involve lying' (1). In her original paper (2) she argued against the 'common view' that deception that did not involve lying was morally no different from deception that ...
متن کاملگفتن خبر بد به بیمار و جوانب مختلف آن
Breaking bad news to the patients does not back to a long history and is a controversial issue between patients and physicians. Many physicians are reluctant to breaking bad news to patients and this is not desirable for most patients. For example, in Northern European countries and United States, most physicians usually break bad news to the patients, while in Southern and Eastern European cou...
متن کاملErosion of Trust in the Medical Profession in India: Time for Doctors to Act
In India, over the last decade, a series of stewardship failures in the health system, particularly in the medical profession, have led to a massive erosion of trust in these institutions. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the situation is similar and has reached crisis proportions; this crisis requires urgent attention. This paper draws on the insights from the recent developme...
متن کاملORGANISATIONAL MATTERS Re-thinking accountability: trust versus confidence in medical practice
In seeking to prevent a reoccurrence of scandals such as that involving cardiac surgery in Bristol, the UK government has adopted a model of regulation that uses rules and surveillance as a way of both improving the quality of care delivered and increasing confidence in healthcare institutions. However, this approach may actually act to reduce confidence and trust while also reducing the moral ...
متن کاملRe-thinking accountability: trust versus confidence in medical practice.
In seeking to prevent a reoccurrence of scandals such as that involving cardiac surgery in Bristol, the UK government has adopted a model of regulation that uses rules and surveillance as a way of both improving the quality of care delivered and increasing confidence in healthcare institutions. However, this approach may actually act to reduce confidence and trust while also reducing the moral ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of medical ethics
دوره 28 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002